damage absorption

For to fix what's broke, and improve what ain't. Or something thereabouts.

Moderator: Moderators

Muhandes
Posts: 732
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 12:54 am
Contact:

damage absorption

Postby Muhandes » Sat Jul 25, 2009 3:55 pm

I remember noticing this some time ago, but I don't see me reporting it. Crystallizer of Dreams has an effect "10% physical damage absorption". Is this different than the usual "damage absorption", or is it the same? And how is damage absorption different from defense anyway?

Satan
Posts: 1855
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 6:29 pm
Location: Florida
Contact:

Re: damage absorption

Postby Satan » Sat Jul 25, 2009 4:42 pm

Damage absorption is direct damage reduction... It means you'll get 90% of the damage you would have originally gotten. Whether that 90% is applied before or after defense is applied, dunno. But defense reduces damage via an unknown formula, along with other factors.

EDIT: To clarify, the 10% physical reduction is only on regular attacks (not sure about criticals), not elemental attacks.

User avatar
Cristiona
Posts: 4924
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 1:01 am
Location: the Conservatory with the lead pipe
Contact:

Re: damage absorption

Postby Cristiona » Sat Jul 25, 2009 7:49 pm

Combat Section of the Manual wrote:3) Don't confuse damage absorption with defense. Damage absorption is almost always more beneficial--if a shield has +1 damage absorption, it means it always reduces the damage you take by 1, whereas +1 defense on that shield only fractionally reduces damage when compared to the opponent's offense.
Image
The churches are empty / The priest has gone home / And we are left standing / Together alone
--October Project: "Dark Time"

Muhandes
Posts: 732
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 12:54 am
Contact:

Re: damage absorption

Postby Muhandes » Sun Jul 26, 2009 11:50 am

Thank you both for clarifying the byway question, but this leave my main question.
Crystallizer of Dreams has an effect "10% physical damage absorption". Is this different than the usual "damage absorption", or is it the same?
What preliminary tests show is that damage absorption is always physical only anyway, so it the preliminary tests wrong (they can be, that's why they are preliminary), making this a unique modifier, or is just a non-standard wording of the same old modifier?

User avatar
Ryme
Site Admin
Posts: 4288
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 2:04 pm
Contact:

Re: damage absorption

Postby Ryme » Sun Jul 26, 2009 12:02 pm

they're the same


Return to “Testing & Debugging”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest