Twilight Forums

Idle chat for wannabe heroes
It is currently Sun May 19, 2013 2:13 pm

All times are UTC - 7 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: damage absorption
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 3:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 12:54 am
Posts: 732
I remember noticing this some time ago, but I don't see me reporting it. Crystallizer of Dreams has an effect "10% physical damage absorption". Is this different than the usual "damage absorption", or is it the same? And how is damage absorption different from defense anyway?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: damage absorption
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 4:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 6:29 pm
Posts: 1773
Location: Florida
Damage absorption is direct damage reduction... It means you'll get 90% of the damage you would have originally gotten. Whether that 90% is applied before or after defense is applied, dunno. But defense reduces damage via an unknown formula, along with other factors.

EDIT: To clarify, the 10% physical reduction is only on regular attacks (not sure about criticals), not elemental attacks.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: damage absorption
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 7:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 1:01 am
Posts: 4228
Location: the Conservatory with the lead pipe
3) Don't confuse damage absorption with defense. Damage absorption is almost always more beneficial--if a shield has +1 damage absorption, it means it always reduces the damage you take by 1, whereas +1 defense on that shield only fractionally reduces damage when compared to the opponent's offense.

_________________
Image
The churches are empty / The priest has gone home / And we are left standing / Together alone
--October Project: "Dark Time"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: damage absorption
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 11:50 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 12:54 am
Posts: 732
Thank you both for clarifying the byway question, but this leave my main question.
Crystallizer of Dreams has an effect "10% physical damage absorption". Is this different than the usual "damage absorption", or is it the same?
What preliminary tests show is that damage absorption is always physical only anyway, so it the preliminary tests wrong (they can be, that's why they are preliminary), making this a unique modifier, or is just a non-standard wording of the same old modifier?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: damage absorption
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 12:02 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 2:04 pm
Posts: 4192
they're the same


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 7 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group